Exploring the sectoral level impacts and absolute emission changes of using alternative fuels in international shipping
2015
The shipping sector is required to reduce fuel sulphur content to 0.1% in Emission Control
Areas by 2015 and to 0.5% globally by 2020. At the same time there is regulation and a need
to address NOx and PM emissions at a localised level and increasing pressure to address the
sector’s rising CO2 emissions, which is a major contributor to global climate change. A
measure to address these challenges is to switch from the use of heavy fuel oil to alternative
fuels that are able to address local pollutants and carbon emissions in parallel. This paper
aims to explore the wider impacts of decisions on the choice of fuel undertaken at ship level.
This is achieved by incorporating into shipping tool deployed in this study (GloTraM) the
upstream and operational emissions for a range of alternative fuels, and test running them
with a series of future scenarios. Key research questions include: (1) what are the total CO2
emissions when GloTraM is run with upstream emission factors added?; (2) what impact do
these emissions have on the amount/type of fuels used in the sector?; (3) What are the nonGHG
emissions and how significant are they compared to CO2 emissions? A life cycle
approach is used to generate the upstream, i.e. well-to-tank emissions, accounting for the
emissions associated with the processes used to grow and/or manufacture, distribute and
dispose of an alternative fuel. The functional unit is tonne of CO2 per tonne of fuel delivered
(to the vessel). These emissions are then incorporated alongside the operational emissions,
which have been taken from the IMO’s 3rd GHG study. The results of the study provide a
better understanding of the magnitude of total emissions from international shipping and the
wider system level implications of fuel switching decisions.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI