Effects of impression levels and trays on the accuracy of impressions taken from angulated implants

Background and purpose: It is crucial to keep the misfit of the abutment–fixture unit at the lowest possible rate. There are a few controversial studies on the accuracy of impression making of angulated implants, and much fewer (and controversial) studies on the abutment-level impression technique, which is a convenient and clinically favorable method. Besides, there are no studies on comparison of sectional vs. full-arch trays. We aimed to assess these. Methods: A trapezoidal model with four angulated implants installed at 20° and 30° buccal tilts was fabricated. Forty impressions were taken from this model, with two groups of full-arch and sectional custom trays (n = 2 9 20), each divided into two subgroups of implant-level and abutment-level techniques (n = 2 9 2 9 10 in four subgroups). Absolute and non-absolute linear and angular impression errors were estimated by comparing the fabricated casts with the model, using a coordinate measuring machine. The effects of sectional/full-arch trays and abutment-level and fixture-level techniques on impression accuracies were analyzed using one- and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA), Tukey, Mann–Whitney, and one-sample t-tests (a = 0.05, Mann– Whitney’s a using the Bonferroni Bonferroni method). Results: No significant differences between the absolute linear errors of the two trays (P = 0.100 [ANOVA]) and the two levels (P = 0.400 [ANOVA]) were observed. The assessment of absolute angular errors showed no significant differences (all P values ≥ 0.4 [ANOVA]). The difference between the linear errors in the full-arch vs. sectional trays was not significant in the fixture-level group (P = 0.290). However, in the abutment-level group, the linear error was significantly greater in the sectional tray compared to full-arch tray (P = 0.013, a = 0.025 [Mann–Whitney]). Conclusions: Using sectional trays might not be advantageous over full-arch trays. Sectional trays are not recommended for taking abutment-level impressions. The abutment-level impression technique is as accurate as the studied fixture-level technique. Increasing the angle of implants’ divergence from 40° to 60° might not usually lead to a significant increase in the errors, particularly when using abutment-level impressions.