Comparison of DVd and VAdM in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Objective To compare effects and toxicities of DVd and VAdM regimen for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.nethods 17 newly diagnosed active multiple myeloma received DVd treatment,dexamethasone(20 mg/d)on days 1～4 as an intravenous infusion.16 newly diagnosed active multiple myeloma on days 1～4 plus melphalan(12 mg/d)as an intravenous infusion.Results Objective response rates(DVd,76.5%;VAd,81.3%,P=0.737)were similar between the two treatment groups.In the DVd group,the mean time to max response was shorter than the VAdM group[(3.2±1.7)months vs.(4.6±1.0)months,P=0.039].DVd was associated with low Grade 3/4 neutropenia(23.5% vs.68.8%,P=0.015),less use of G-CSF(11.8% vs.62.5%,P=0.004),less use antibiotic(11.8% vs.37.5%,P=0.118),lower incidence of hospitalization for adverse events(37.5% vs.17.6%,P=0.259),but more hand-foot syndrome.Coilcinsion The DVd regimen demonstrated similar efficacy compared with VAdM,while with less toxicity and supportive care,which might be used as a modified VAd regimen for newly diagnosed myeloma. Key words: DVd; VAdM; Multiple myeloma; Treatment