Monitoring the risk for a “valley of inadequate anesthesia” using bispectral index and the noxious stimulation response index during different inflow speeds of sevoflurane.

Title: Monitoring the risk for a “valley of inadequate anesthesia” using bispectral index and the noxious stimulation response index during different inflow speeds of sevoflurane. Authors: Mira Van Thielen MD1 2, Rik Carette MD1 , Jan F.A. Hendrickx MD, PhD1 2 , Andre M. De Wolf MD, PhD3 , Hugo E.M. Vereecke MD, PhD4 5 Affilliations: 1 OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; 2 Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; 3 Northwestern University, Chicago, USA; 4 AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium; 5 University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands Abstract Introduction: The “valley of inadequate anesthesia” refers to an increased risk for awareness, movement or hemodynamic instability evoked by an insufficient inflow of volatile agents to compensate for the gradual elimination of intravenously administered boluses of induction agents. The combined drug effects of volatile and intravenous drugs should ensure a sufficient hypnotic drug effect and immobility (as respectively quantified by bispectral index (BIS, Medtronic) and the noxious stimulation response index (NSRI, Drager)), while maintaining stability in arterial blood pressure (ABP) and heart rate (HR). NSRI is a derivative of the probability of tolerance of laryngoscopy, as estimated by Hannivoort et al. for most combinations of propofol, opioids and volatile agents.1 NSRI of 20 equals an estimated probability of immobility in response to laryngoscopy of 90%. We compare the time course of BIS, NSRI, ABP and HR after a bolus of propofol and sufentanil, followed by three different inflow speeds of sevoflurane. We hypothesize that BIS and NSRI should stay below 60 and 20, respectively, at all times between the start of sevoflurane and reaching a target of 1.0 MAC. We also compare ABP and HR between groups. Methods: 33 ASA score I-III patients (age range: 27-86 years; BMI range 22-34 kg/m2 ) presenting for abdominal surgery received sufentanil (0.2 µg/kg) and propofol (1 or 2 mg/kg, depending on age) followed by intubation of the trachea, 2.5 min after loss of responsiveness and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). Sevoflurane was administered (after randomization) in a ‘slow’(n = 9), ‘medium’(n = 8), and ‘fast’(n = 9) group; defined by a time constant of respectively 10.9, 5.7, and 2.6 min wash-in time towards 1.0 MAC. These inflow speeds are similar to those used in a commercialized automatic controller of the inflow of volatile agents (Flow-I, Maquet). BIS and NSRI were blinded to the anesthesiologist. For all measures, the 95% confidence interval (CI 95%) of the difference of means was calculated at one minute intervals between minutes 0 to 25 after propofol (p 60 and/or NSRI > 20 (n in slow > medium > fast). High BIS and NSRI were not always consistent. Figure 2 shows similar BIS and NSRI during the first 8 minutes in all groups, confirming equipotency for these measures till the start of sevoflurane. Mean NSRI differs between slow and medium, slow and fast and medium and fast (respectively from minute 10 to 18, 10 to 20 and 10 to 14) evoked by the deliberate differences in inflow speed of sevoflurane. Mean BIS differs between slow and medium and slow and fast (respectively from minute 15 to 16 and 11 to 24). Heart rate and blood pressure did not differ between groups. A Brice questionnaire found no cases of explicit recall. Conclusion: After a bolus dose of propofol, sufentanil, and rocuronium, both BIS>60 and NSRI>20 warn the anesthesiologist for an increased risk of a “valley of inadequate anesthesia”. ABP and HR don’t identify differences in drug potency between groups. A higher initial dose of sufentanil (e.g. 0,3 µg/kg) might reduce the need for escape treatment. Reference 1. Hannivoort LN, et al., Br J Anaesth. 2016 May;116(5):624-31.