Misleading terms in Anderson-Fabry disease

Background  Signs and symptoms of classic Fabry disease manifest itself on the skin (angiokeratoma), the nervous system (acroparaesthesia), the heart (restrictive cardiomyopathy) and a variety of other organs. Materials and methods  Diagnosis of Fabry disease was confirmed by genetic tests in a cohort of 100 patients and a standardized examination programme was performed in all patients. We were puzzled when applying well-established and textbook-anchored signs and symptoms to our patients. Results  Among the 47 male and 53 female patients (mean age 41 ± 16 years) with genetically proven disease, the Fabry-type vascular skin lesions were without hyperkeratotic aspect and keratomas were virtually absent. The peripheral neuropathic pain found in all male patients was not compatible with the wording ‘acro’ and ‘paraesthesia’, suggesting a different pathophysiological mechanism. Upon echocardiographic examination, patients mainly revealed diastolic relaxation abnormalities of the heart and only one patient had a restrictive cardiac pattern. Conclusions  Our findings suggest that some terms used to describe signs and symptoms of Fabry disease are historically derived and do not comply with state-of-the-art examination. We propose to replace the term ‘angiokeratoma’ with ‘angioma’, the term ‘acroparaesthesia’ with ‘neuropathic pain’ and the term ‘restrictive cardiomyopathy’ with ‘cardiac hypertrophic storage disease’. As most of the physicians are not familiar with Fabry disease, terms used in the past might prevent the correct diagnosis of a potentially treatable disease.