Locking versus non-locking plating system in the treatment of mandibular fractures: A randomized comparative study

Abstract Objective To evaluate fracture stability and complications such as infections, need for hardware removal, malunion, and nonunion when using 2.0-mm locking plating system in fixation of mandible fractures and to compare these to those associated with the 2.0-mm non-locking plating system. Materials and Methods A prospective clinical study was conducted in a cohort of mandible fracture patients who were randomly assigned to two groups. Patients in the non-locking group were treated with 2.0-mm non-locking plating system, and those in locking group were treated with 2.0-mm locking plating system. Fracture stability, need for maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) and postoperative complications were assessed and compared. Results A total of 60 patients (30 in each group) were recruited. Significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to postoperative fracture stability (P= 0.001) and need for MMF (P= 0.005). Multivariate analysis revealed that type of fixation was not the only dependent variable which affected fracture stability. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusion The 2.0-mm locking plating system provides greater stability and early functional restoration than the 2.0-mm non-locking plating system, with similar rates of postoperative complications. Thus, it can be used as a reliable and effective treatment modality for treating mandibular fractures.