Minimally invasive peri-acetabular osteotomy: early comparative results versus ilio-femoral approach

Aims To determine whether there is any benefit using a minimally invasive trans-sartorial approach as described by Professor Soballe compared to the ilio-femoral for peri-acetabular osteotomy Methods 30 consecutive patients were operated on by a single surgeon. The first 15 underwent an ilio-femoral (I-F) approach whilst the following 15 had a trans-sartorial (T-S) approach. Fixation was achieved with 3 or 4 screws. All other aspects of surgery and rehabilitation were the same. Data was collected prospectively and included operation time, intra-operative blood loss and length of stay. Acetabular correction was measured using the sourcil and centre edge angle (CEA) on pre and post-operative radiographs. Results Both groups had acceptable radiographic corrections with CEA improving from mean 14.5 to 38.7 degrees (T-S) and 14 to 39 degrees (I-F). The sourcil angle improved from mean 17.8 to 2 degrees (T-S) and 19.5 to −1.5 (I-F). Minimally invasive surgery reduced anaesthetic time by 62 minutes. Haemoglobin loss was reduced by 1 gram/L and there was no requirement for transfusion. Hospital stay reduced by 0.8 days. There were no major adverse complications although two partial femoral neurapraxias were noted early in the series. These fully resolved. Conclusion We have found significant benefit from changing to minimally invasive PAO. Our patients have smaller wounds, a shorter operative time, reduced bleeding and a shorter length of stay. We found no adverse effects. The time savings have also corresponded to a cost saving for our institution. We recommend this technique although recognise that it has a learning curve and should be initiated by surgeons with previous PAO experience