Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) - A Retrospective Study

Abstract 4469 Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) is an important criterion to define risk of relapse in Acute Leukemia (AL). The most powerful methods for MRD characterization are PCR, and flow cytometry (FCM). Although PCR is more sensible that FCM, respectively 10 −4 and 10 −3 logs, FCM is more applicable than PCR, usually more than 80% versus less than 50% to PCR. In patients eligible for HSTC, the value of MRD is being studied and some results showed implications both in overall survival (OS) as in event free survival (EFS). The RCI seems to be influenced by the presence or absence of MRD, as well. Nowadays the most important factor that influences survival is the relapse. Then, the earlier relapse detection has a potential to improve the therapeutic results. We presented the results of MRD before and after HSTC and its prognostic significance. Other evaluated factors were: age, acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD), cell source (bone marrow, peripheral blood, cord blood), ATG use, myeloablative conditioning or not, related (RD) and unrelated donor (UD), donor gender and disease status. Bone marrow of 112 AML patients were analyzed by FCM, since January/ 2008 until April / 2011. The evaluation was made in irregular period of time with variable number of samples by patients. They were from 1 to 61 years old. It was considered for analysis the patients that had MRD > 0,1% and It was observed statistical significance in univariate analysis related to OS the following factors: RD (64%) × UR (42%) (p = 0,002), no ATG use (64%) × ATG use (44%) × (p = 0,003%), no aGVHD (63%) (p = 0,016) × aGVHD II to IV (50%), age > 40 years old (yo) (70%), 20 to 40 yo (59%) and 0,1% (36%) (p=0,001) (fig 1). The other factors did not show statistical significance with a negative tendency to cord blood use (p = 0,079). To RCI, the significance was observed in: patient age 40 yo (21%) (p=0,015); and MRD after TCTH > 0,1% (73%) × MRD st remission (p = 0,07) and cGVHD (p = 0,08). The group of 44 patients that did not has MRD neither before or after HSCT showed OS of 85% in three years and 11% of RCI. The five morphologic relapses observed in this group suggest that a regular monitorization of MRD must be done. The only factor that kept statistical significance in multivariate analysis was MRD > 0,1% after TCTH in RCI (p = 0,001 HR = 9,93) and for OS (p = 0,001 HR = 3,77) (Tables 1 and 2). In conclusion, the presence of MDR > 0,1% was the only independent prognostic factor for survival and relapse in AML patients after HSCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. Table 1:OS multivariate analysis Table 2:RCI multivariate analysis Figure 1: OS of patients after HSCT P = 0,000