The alertness level influences post-error adjustments
2016
Post-error adjustment indicates that individuals execute a chain
of adjustments after committing errors to reduce the likelihood of
repeating an error, which is important for our survival and evolution.
It includes post-error slowing (PES), post-error improvement in accuracy
(PIA), and post-error reduction of interference (PERI) three types.
However, there are still intensive disputes about the generation mechanisms
of the post-error adjustment. The cognitive control account suggests that errors are associated
with the error monitoring and a subsequent intensification of top-down
control. After committing an error, the error signal will initiate
cognitive control mechanisms to improve subsequent performance by
activating the anterior cingulate cortex. In this case, increased
cognitive control enables flexible recruitment of attentional resources
to the goal-related dimension in the subsequent task. However, the
orienting account assumes that the infrequent events can easily capture
the attentional resources, and thus participants need to take more
time to reorient the subsequent task. The remaining resources will
be insufficient to perform effectively the subsequent task, behaving
as decreased post-error accuracy. Therefore, how the attention influences
the post-error adjustment remains unclear. To address the above issue, we first employed an attention network
test (ANT) to evaluate the attention function of each participant.
The ANT task was developed to measure the efficiency of the attentional
networks including alerting, orienting and executive control through
a simple cue (asterisk) and arrow Flanker task. There were four cue
conditions: no cue, center cue, double cue, and spatial cue. In the
no cue condition, only the fixation cross was presented in the center
of the screen. In the center cue condition, an asterisk was presented
in the center of the screen. In the double cue and spatial cue conditions,
the fixation cross was always presented in the center of the screen.
However, for the double cue condition, two asterisks were presented
simultaneously at two possible target positions; for the spatial cue
condition, an asterisk was presented at the target position. Additionally,
the efficiency of alerting was defined as RT no cue – RT double cue , the
efficiency of orienting was defined as RT center
cue – RT spatial cue , and the
efficiency of executive control was defined as RT incongruent – RT congruent . Then, we employed a letter Flanker task to examine the participants’
performance in the post-error trials. PES was calculated by the RT
of correct trials following errors minus the RT of correct trials
following correct responses. PIA was calculated by the accuracy following
errors minus the accuracy following correct response. And PERI was
calculated by the interference magnitude ( RT incongruent – RT congruent )
following correct responses minus the interference magnitude following
errors. To investigate which function of the attentional network influences
the post-error adjustment, we correlated the scores of alerting, orienting
and executive control with PES, PIA, and PERI, respectively. Finally,
based on the correlation result, we grouped the participants as high
altering level group (32% participants) and low alerting level group
(32% participants) to further examine the individual difference in
the post-error adjustment. As a result, we found that only the alerting score was negatively
correlated with PES and PIA. Moreover, in the individual difference
analysis, we found that the PES was only observed in the low alerting
level group, but this effect was absent in the high alerting level
group. For the PIA, there was no significant difference between two
groups. These results may suggest that the alerting function plays
an important role in the post-error adjustments, especially for the
PES. High alerting level group has an advantage on enhanced alertness;
they accordingly complete post-error adjustment with high efficiency.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
2
Citations
NaN
KQI