Priority setting for research in the field of medical ethics in the Islamic Republic of Iran: a Delphi study

Background Priority-setting is one way to develop research in a particular field. Aims We aimed to identify and prioritize the most important medical ethics issues for research in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Methods A 3-round Delphi survey was conducted using a questionnaire covering 77 medical ethics topics in 10 categories and subcategories (extracted from literature review); this was emailed to 40 experts in medical ethics. The participants rated categories and subcategories for importance on a 5-point Likert scale and ranked the topics based on their research priorities. The highest Likert score showed the most important issue and the lowest priority score indicated the first priority. Results After consensus, the panel identified 6 categories as the highest priority and most important areas: professionalism [priority score = 2.66, standard deviation (SD) 2.63, importance score = 4.45, SD 0.72], education (priority score=3.12, SD 1.89, importance score = 4.25, SD 0.84), end of life (priority score = 3.79, SD 1.91, importance score = 4.47, SD 0.66), beginning of life (priority = 4.62, SD 1.68, importance score= 4.26, SD 0.61), public health (priority score = 5.20, SD 2.39, importance score = 4.29, SD 0.75), and ethics in research (priority score = 5.33, SD 1.97, importance score = 4.34, SD 0.64). Conclusion The rankings for priority and importance was not the same. Our results highlight a lack of applicable knowledge in the areas of professionalism and end of life. This study could be used as a foundation for developing further investigations by ensuring the most appropriate use of limited resources.