La lógica y el concepto de la desconstrucción

espanolRESUMEN Los dos motivos principales que estructuran este trabajo son la continuidad tematica y formal en toda la obra de Jacques Derrida. En un recorrido minucioso y exhaustivo de su obra, hemos podido mostrar que la desconstruccion practicada por Jacques Derrida se concibe bajo una unidad formal y tematica desapercibida hasta el momento -incluso para la critica desconstructiva mas cercana. La metodologia seguida en este trabajo de tesis doctoral no ha sido otra que leer a Jacques Derrida tal y como el mismo se da a leer en su propia obra. Dentro una estrategia claramente "auto-bio-grafica", la desconstruccion practicada por Jacques Derrida ha trazado con evidencias mas que suficientes en toda su obra que su proceder cuasi-metodologico asi como su despliegue conceptual, forman parte de una "demarche "logique"", necesaria e irreversible; no solo desde 1965 con "De la grammatologie" hasta su ultimo seminario de 2002-2003 La bete et le souverain II, sino mas aca y mas alla de estas dos referencias mayores. La demostracion de la continuidad oblicua en la obra de Derrida, nos ha permitido deshacer, en la medida de lo posible, algunos de los grandes malentendidos que rodean la obra de este gran pensador de finales del siglo XX: la desconstruccion no es, como se ha dicho, ni una filosofia del lenguaje ni un pensamiento ajeno a lo politico. Todo lo contrario. La desconstruccion se ha concebido desde sus inicios como un discurso teorico y practico a la vez, como un discurso cuyos conceptos solo son validos si quedan probados, incorporados o realizados en la praxis. La segunda parte de este trabajo muestra la doble necesidad que tiene todo discurso critico o desconstructivo tanto de formalizar la realidad como la imposibilidad estructural de llevar a cabo una formalizacion completa de ella. Esta formalizacion inclausurable nos llevara, inexorablemente, a las diferentes formalizaciones realizadas en el "recorrido "logico"" de la desconstruccion bajo la cadena abierta de conceptos indecidibles como differance, double bind, aporia, proceso auto-inmunitario, etc. En esta cadena de figuras indecidibles, aparecera, en la tercera parte de este trabajo, el operador meta-logico que estructura a todas ellas: la indecidibilidad. Con la cadena de conceptos indecidibles y su operador mayor, la indecidibilidad, quedan esbozadas las lineas fundamentales de la logica y los conceptos de la desconstruccion, tal y como los ha practicado en su obra el propio Jacques Derrida. EnglishThe two main motifs behind this work are as follows: the thematic and the formal continuity throughout all the work Jacques Derrida. After an exhaustive and in the minutest detail demarche of his work, we have been able to show that deconstruction practised by Jacques Derrida's work is conceived according to a formal and thematic unity, which is not perceived until the very last moment - even by the closest deconstructive critical examination. The methodology followed in this work has been no more than reading Derrida in just the way he offers himself to be read I. His own work. By using a clearly "auto-bio-graphical" strategy, deconstruction practiced by Jacques Derrida has been inscribed, with more than sufficient evidence, that his quasi-methodological procedure, just like his conceptual deployment, forms a part of a "demarche 'logique'", which is necessary and irreversible, and which is present demarche throughout all the work, not only since 1965 with "De la grammatologie" up to his last seminar of 2002-2003 La bete et le souverain II, but also outside by on this side on these two major points of reference. Demonstrating the oblique continuity in Derrida's work has permitted us to disprove, insofar as is possible, one of the main problems in understanding the work of this great thinker of the end of the XX century. As has been said, deconstruction is neither a philosophy of language, nor a way of thinking that is alien to politics. Quite the contrary. Right from the start deconstruction was conceived as a way of reasoning which is that both theoretical and practical, just like a way of reasoning, the concepts of which are only valid if they are proved or incorporated into praxis. The second part of this work shows the double necessity, which all critical or deconstructive discourse has for formalising reality, as well as the structural impossibility of realising a complete formalisation of it. This unclosurable formalisation will lead us to the different formalisations realised in the deconstruction "demarche 'logique'" in the open chain of undecidable concepts, such as, differance, double bind, iterability, aporia, autoimmune process, etc. In this chain of undecidable figures, the metalogical operator, which structures all of them, will appear in the third part of this work: undecidability. Together with the chain of undecidable concepts and its major operator, undecidability, logic and the concepts of deconstruction are designed in their main fundamentals as have been practised by Jacques Derrida.