Modular Psychotherapy Outcomes for Youth With Different Latent Profiles of Irritability and Emotion Dysregulation

2021 
Background: Severe irritability is a common, impairing problem among youth referred for mental health services, but evidence to guide care is limited. Treatment research can be advanced by adopting a transdiagnostic perspective, leveraging existing evidence-based treatment (EBT) techniques, and situating irritability within the context of emotion dysregulation. Accordingly, this study examined treatment outcomes for youth with different levels of irritability and dysregulation who received cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or behavioral parent training (BPT) in a modular EBT framework. Method: We analyzed data from a community-based implementation trial of a transdiagnostic youth psychotherapy. Two-hundred referred youths (7-15 years; 47% female; 33% White, 28% Black, 24% Latinx, 14% multiracial, 2% other) and their caregivers completed measures of clinical problems and emotion dysregulation at baseline, with repeated outcomes assessments over 18 months. Latent profile analyses were applied to baseline irritability and emotion dysregulation data; then, latent growth curve models were used to examine outcome trajectories, controlling for covariates. Results: A two-class solution fit well, differentiating youth with high (n=54) vs. low (n=146) levels of baseline irritability and dysregulation. Nearly everyone in the high irritability/dysregulation group had been treated with either BPT (n=26) or CBT for depression (n=23). Across all groups and measures, participants showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements over time. High- and low-irritability/dysregulation youth were similar in their trajectories of change, with virtually no differential effects for BPT vs. CBT. Conclusions: Youth with severe irritability and dysregulation, treated with a transdiagnostic, modular, EBT approach, showed significant within-person improvements over time. Their outcome trajectories did not differ according to whether they received BPT or CBT. These findings extend the literature on modular, transdiagnostic, and EBT approaches for irritability and dysregulation, suggesting comparable benefits associated with BPT and CBT—when treatment selection is guided by a comprehensive baseline clinical assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03153904
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    64
    References
    0
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []