Stroke network performance during COVID-19 pandemic: A meta-analysis

Background and Aims: The effect of the COVID pandemic on stroke networks performance are unclear, particularly with consideration of drip & ship versus mothership models. We systematically reviewed and metaanalyzed variations in stroke admissions, rate and timing of reperfusion treatments during the COVID pandemic versus the prepandemic timeframe. Methods: The systematic review followed registered protocol (PROSPERO-CRD42020211535), PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL until 9/10/ 2020, for studies reporting variations in ischemic stroke admissions, treatment rates and timing in COVID vs control-period. Primary outcome was the weekly admission incidence rate ratio (IRR=admissions during COVID-period/admissions during control-period). Secondary outcomes were (i) changes in rate of patients undergoing reperfusion treatment and (ii) time metrics for pre-and in-hospital phase. Results: Twenty-nine studies were included in qualitative synthesis, with 212960 patients observed for 532 cumulative weeks (325 control-period, 207 COVID-period). COVID-period was associated with a significant reduction in stroke admission rates (IRR=0.69, 95%CI, 0.61-0.79) and a higher relative presentation with large vessel occlusion stroke (RR=1.62, 95%CI, 1.24-2.12). Proportions of patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis remained unchanged, while endovascular treatment increased (RR=1.14, 95%CI, 1.02-1.28). Onset-to-door time was longer for drip&ship compared to mothership model (+32 minutes vs-12 minutes, pmeta-regression =.03). Conclusions: Despite a 35% drop in stroke admissions during the pandemic, proportions of patients receiving reperfusion and time-metrics were not inferior to control-period, justifying allocation of resources to keep stroke networks up and running.