Comparative Assessment of Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and Conventional Methods in the Identification of Clinically Relevant Yeasts.

BACKGROUND Candida species are generally identified by conventional methods such as germ tube or morphological appearance on cornmeal agar (CMA), biochemical methods using API kits, and molecular biological techniques. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) has revolutionized the identification of fungi reducing the turnaround time of days to minutes. PURPOSE To compare the performance of MALDI-TOF MS and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant yeasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this study, Candida identifications on CMA are compared with the results obtained on MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Discrepant results were confirmed by sequencing internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of rDNA. RESULTS A total of 114 clinical Candida species isolated from blood cultures were isolated and identified with conventional methods as well as with the MALDI-TOF-MS system. The agreement between the two test results were analyzed using Inter-rater reliability analysis (Cohen's Kappa) in SPSS Software Version 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Overall, there was substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa=0.763) between the two methods. A value between 0.61 and 0.80 is classified under substantial. The most frequently isolated bloodstream Candida species included Candida albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C.lusitaniae, C. glabrata which were accurately identified by MALDI-TOF-MS. When compared with conventional identification methods, MALDI-TOF-MS results are more reliable and rapid for Candida identification.