Laparoscopic-assisted versus conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn's disease: results of a comparative study.

Summary Introduction The laparoscopic approach is becoming the gold standard in the surgical treatment of primary Crohn's disease. The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for primary Crohn's disease. Methods We conducted a non-randomized, comparative, retrospective analysis of a prospective database from 1998 to 2010. The remaining 129 patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic-assisted group (Group L; n  = 64) and conventional group (Group C; n  = 65). There were no differences between the two groups as regards preoperative patient characteristics. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results One hundred and seventeen (90.7%) patients had no complications. Out of 12 patients (9.3%) with complications, four (3.1%) had Grade I, six (4.7%) had Grade II and two (1.6%) had Grade III. There were no postoperative deaths (Grade V). Operating time was longer in Group L compared with Group C ( P P  = 0.018) and resumption of a regular diet ( P  = 0.06). The mean length of stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group ( P  = 0.001). The mean follow-up was 26 months in Group L versus 34 months in Group C ( P  = 0.06). During follow-up, six patients presented with small bowel obstruction in Group C, which was not statistically different from Group L (3 patients) ( P  = 0.25). During the follow-up period, there have been no recurrences of Crohn's disease in the laparoscopic group while 11 patients (16.9%) have developed a recurrence in the conventional group ( P  = 0.001). Conclusion Laparoscopic-assisted ileocolectomy for primary Crohn's disease of the terminal ileum and/or cecum is safe and successful in most cases. Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease should be considered as the preferred operative approach for primary resections.