Facing forward after Ebola: questions for the next director general of the World Health Organization

In light of heavy criticism of the WHO’s handling of the Ebola outbreak, the election process for the next director general will be under intense scrutiny. Devi Sridhar and colleagues outline the key questions on epidemic preparedness for prospective candidates When the member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) elect a new director general in May 2017, they will decide the future of the organisation. The agency needs a strong global health leader determined to regain the trust of the international community and to position WHO in a rapidly changing environment.1 The history of director general elections indicates that member states consider many factors when choosing a candidate: political alliances, diplomatic deals, and regional considerations all come into play. This makes it hard to decide on the best candidate for the job. #### BOX: Timeline for nominating and appointing WHO’s director general8 We were members of three independent panels that have met over the past year to review the responses to the Ebola crisis, especially the work of the WHO.2 3 4 Our panels agreed that strong leadership was essential in the face of health crisis, and we are concerned about where director general candidates stand on the challenges faced by global and national organisations responding to a health emergency (any event that creates a health risk to the public) or disease outbreak. In contrast to the election of the UN secretary general, there is no provision for public debate …