Comparison of Electronic and Self-Reported Pedometer Step Counts in a Dog Walking Study
2018
1. Abstract Some
pedometers capture an electronic record of steps, while others require that
participants read step counts from the pedometer and record them in a separate
log. This study characterizes discrepancies between self-report and electronic
capture of daily step counts, compares compliance between methods over time,
and assesses reliability and validity of average daily step counts using both
methods. Daily step counts were obtained from a sample of 29 participants over
a three-month period using both electronically stored pedometer recordings and
paper-and-pencil activity logs based on pedometer readings. Differences in
compliance and average step counts between pedometer and self-reported were low
to moderate, and self-reported step counts were of sufficient quantity and quality
that they provide a reliable, valid and possibly less expensive alternative to
pedometer step counts. The
purpose of this paper is to identify and characterize discrepancies between
self-report and electronic capture of daily step counts in a sample of
participants asked to wear a pedometer for three months. We also compare
compliance between methods over time, and assess reliability and validity of
average daily step counts using both methods. We hypothesize that electronic
capture of daily step counts will be associated with higher compliance, and
more valid and reliable data than self-report of daily step counts in a
hand-written activity log 2. Keywords: Compliance; Dog walking; Physical
activity; Reliability; Self-report; Validity
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI