Reply to “Comment on ‘Natural Bond Orbitals and the Nature of the Hydrogen Bond’”

2018 
We respond to the Comment by Weinhold \& Glendening criticising the paper by Stone (J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 1531-1534 (2017)). We conclude that their comment offers no argument against Stone's criticism of the NBO formulation of the charge-transfer energy. Their critique of symmetry-adapted perturbation theory contains a number of errors and misconceptions.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    27
    References
    15
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []