Development and validation of the scale to assess satisfaction with medications for addiction treatment-methadone for heroin addiction (SASMAT-METHER)

2014 
Abstract Objective To develop and examine the psychometric properties of a scale to specifically assess satisfaction with methadone in heroin-dependent patients. Methods The 44-item preliminary version of the scale to assess satisfaction with medications for addiction treatment–methadone for heroin addiction (SASMAT–METHER) was obtained from a pool of items designed to assess satisfaction with any medication-addiction combination. Theoretical domains of the initial SASMAT–METHER were overall satisfaction, pharmacotherapy, initiation, anti-addictive effect on heroin, mental state, physical state, personal functioning, acceptability, and anti-addictive effect on secondary substances. The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication 1.4 version (TSQM 1.4) and the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale for Methadone Treatment (VSSS-MT) were used for concurrent validation. Participants included heroin-dependent patients receiving methadone treatment for at least the last 3 months. Results The preliminary version of the SASMAT–METHER scale was completed by 241 patients, with 180 surveys considered suitable for factor analysis. Principal component analysis of these SASMAT–METHER surveys revealed a 3-factor structure that accounted for 40.4% of total variance. Based on similarities between empirically-obtained factors and theoretical domains, factors 1 through 3 were named ‘Personal Functioning and Well-Being’ (7 items), ‘Anti-Addictive Effect on Heroin’ (5 items), and ‘Anti-Addictive Effect on Other Substances’ (5 items). All factors showed good to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α : 0.83–0.92) and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.66–0.89). Correlations between overall SASMAT–METHER and TSQM 1.4 scores were stronger (Pearson r  = 0.69) than correlations between overall SASMAT–METHER and VSSS-MT scores (Pearson r  = 0.26). Conclusion These results present evidence for the validity and reliability of SASMAT–METHER.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    34
    References
    7
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []