Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs 15O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve

Michelle C. Williams,Saeed Mirsadraee,Marc R. Dweck,Nicholas W Weir,Alison Fletcher,Christophe Lucatelli,Tom MacGillivray,Saroj K Golay,Nicholas L. Cruden,Peter Henriksen,Neal G. Uren,Graham McKillop,Joao Lima,John H. Reid,Edwin J. R. van Beek,Dilip Patel,David E. Newby

Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs 15O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve

2017

Michelle C. Williams
Saeed Mirsadraee
Marc R. Dweck
Nicholas W Weir
Alison Fletcher
Christophe Lucatelli
Tom MacGillivray
Saroj K Golay
Nicholas L. Cruden
Peter Henriksen
Neal G. Uren
Graham McKillop
Joao Lima
John H. Reid
Edwin J. R. van Beek
Dilip Patel
David E. Newby

Objectives Computed tomography (CT) can perform comprehensive cardiac imaging. We compared CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) with 15O-water positron emission tomography (PET) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Keywords:

Radiology
Angiography
Fractional flow reserve
Positron emission tomography
Myocardial perfusion imaging
Perfusion scanning
Nuclear medicine
Cardiac imaging
Computed tomography angiography
Perfusion
Medicine

Correction
Source
Cite
Save
Machine Reading By IdeaReader

References

Citations