Production-worthy OPC verification methods for protecting against process variability
2007
In this paper we report on alternate solutions to protect against process variability - while also focusing on minimizing
simulation time. We have investigated a variety of techniques, including the use of aerial image parameters to flag sites
that might be sensitive to changes in dose, a mask error enhancement factor (MEEF) check based on biasing of the
optical proximity correction (OPC) layer to reflect mask variations, and a sorting approach where sites with suspect
parameters (e.g. high MEEF or poor aerial image quality, such as low slope) are simulated using multiple process
conditions. All of these techniques represent shortcuts as compared to simulations of the full chip at multiple process
conditions, and thus savings in CPU time. However, use of these short cuts can have several down-sides: first, increased
risk of missing a real error, and second, increases in the number of false errors reported (where false errors are sites
which are predicted to fail, but actually have an adequate window to allow for process variability). The challenge is to
find methods to make the short cuts as selective as possible, so that they will flag all potentially failing sites, without
flagging too many false errors.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI