Two ways of interpreting the problem of intersubjectivity in Husserl's late philosophy and its possible solutions by M. Henry and M. Richir
2020
TWO WAYS OF INTERPRETING THE PROBLEM OF INTERSUBJECTIVITY
IN HUSSERL’S LATE PHILOSOPHY AND ITS POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
BY MICHEL HENRY AND MARC RICHIR
Summary
This article is an analysis of two conceptions of both awareness of other persons and
relations with them put forward by Michel Henry and Marc Richir – philosophers
who are associated with “new phenomenology in France”. My aim is to show how
they reinterpret Husserl’s view of intersubjectvity and attempt to solve the issues
related to traditional phenomenological solution. Thanks to rejecting Husserl’s notion
of intentionality, they provide a new ground for analysis. The originality of their
account lies in an introduction of the very notion of passivity (Henry) and transcedental
interfacticity (Richir). In spite of some differences between them, they can
be considered as ideas that shed a new light on the problem of intersubjectivity in
phenomenology.
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI