The King's Silver Bullet--Is There Still a Need

Abstract : The purpose of this paper is to consider whether or not a need still exists for Artillery Fired Atomic Projectiles. The range of opinions extend from staunch support of AFAPs to complete rejection. The paper sift through the various arguments presented to resolve the problem. The process includes establishment of a framework to analyze the arguments. The framework is comprised of a review of the rationale for the initial placement of nuclear weapons in Europe, a summary of the U.S. and U.S.S.R. stockpiles, the attainable results, and a discussion of current policy and consideration for use of these weapons. This is followed by the presentation and analysis of the arguments. The framework is comprised of a review of the rationale for the initial placement of nuclear weapons in Europe, a summary of the U.S. and U.S.S.R. stockpiles, the attainable results, and a discussion of current policy and considerations for use of these weapons. This is followed by the presentation and analysis of the arguments which support and oppose a continued role for AFAPs. The author concludes that there is a continued need for AFAPs and recommends that NATO maintain its stockpile until such time as there exists a conventional system which provides similar capabilities for deterrence and destruction. Keywords: Advanced conventional munitions, Collateral damage, Doctrine.