Safety, efficacy, and cost-performance of a simplified cryoballoon ablation procedure for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND The search for a less invasive and lower cost cryoballoon-based strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has resulted in a simplified procedure that may be suitable for cryoballoon ablation (CBA). Here, we compared procedural characteristics and outcomes between conventional CBA and simple CBA. METHODS We enrolled 628 consecutive patients who underwent initial CBA for AF (age, 69 ± 12 years; female, 263 (42%); paroxysmal AF, 576 (92%); CHA2DS2-VASc score, 2.7 ± 1.6 points). Simple CBA was characterized by the minimal procedure required to isolate pulmonary veins, including the following: (1) CBA was performed without guidance from a 3-D mapping system; (2) a coronary sinus electrode and esophageal temperature probe were not used; (3) a waiting period after pulmonary vein isolation was not set; and AF induction by isoproterenol and atrial burst stimuli were not performed. RESULTS Simple CBA was performed in 240 (38%) patients. Procedural time (49 ± 18 versus 85 ± 27 min, p < 0.01) was shorter, and total procedural costs (20,699 ± 8,091 versus 30,350 ± 11,647 US dollars, p < 0.01) were lower with simple CBA than conventional CBA. Freedom from AF recurrence during the 12-month study period (79.8% versus 78.4%, p = 0.52) and complication rate (8.8% versus 13.1%, p = 0.09) were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION Compared with conventional CBA, simple CBA reduced procedural time and procedural costs while providing comparable outcomes.