El rol de la sociedad civil en las relaciones de poder con Monsanto Company y con el estado

Today more than ever becomes relevant the issue of non-state actors in a globalized and immersed in the technological revolution has made it easier for multinational corporations, civil society and the world at large, act beyond the geographical borders of the United configuring complex relationships between the various actors in the international system. However, the understanding of the phenomena of international reality requires not only the establishment of concepts and classifications of these actors but the study of their interactions to establish the role each plays in the international system. For this purpose it is appropriate to consider those cases worldwide dimension which allows an overall assessment of the behavior of each actor, so it was selected to study the dynamics of power relationships between powerful multinational Monsanto, democratic modern state of Western and civil society, in order to establish the role of this last actor in the context of power relations with these actors, and thus to make an approach to the role it plays in the international system. To this end, a characterization of each of the actors in question is made and define what your goals are, secondly, the description of the dynamics of their interactions through which makes establishing strategies and scenarios interaction analyzing the role played by civil society. The development work of the contributions of different authors who have contributed to the building of knowledge of the pluralist paradigm of international relations; and systemic theory of David Easton (1965) to explain some of the interactions. The central argument is that the interactions produced between Monsanto and the State, civil society determined between setting to interact with these power relations in which plays the role of limiting the autonomy of the state and corporate power of Monsanto. Non-state actors, Monsanto, State, civil society, power relations, food sovereignty.