Are clinical outcomes affected by type of plate used for management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures?
2018
Background
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using plate osteosynthesis for midshaft clavicle fractures is often complicated by the prominence of the implant due to the subcutaneous position of the clavicle. Reoperation rates for symptomatic clavicle plate removal have been reported to be as high as 53%. We sought to determine to which degree do clinical outcomes (all cause reoperation rate and rate of fracture union) differ between types of clavicle plates.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
27
References
12
Citations
NaN
KQI