Mapping human V4: Correcting artefact reveals hemifield organisation
2015
Paper presented at the Australasian Experimental Psychology Conference 2015, 8-11 April 2015, Sydney, Australia. Keywords v4, correcting, human, artefact, mapping, reveals, hemifield, organisation Disciplines Education | Social and Behavioral Sciences Publication Details Taylor, H., Puckett, A., Isherwood, Z. & Schira, M. (2015). Mapping human V4: Correcting artefact reveals hemifield organisation. Australasian Experimental Psychology Conference 2015 This conference paper is available at Research Online: http://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/1586 Mapping
human
V4:
Correcting
artefact
reveals
hemifield
organisation Harriet
Taylor,
Alexander
Puckett,
Zoey
Isherwood,
Mark
Schira University
of
Wollongong ht380@uowmail.edu.au Ongoing
difficulties
in
mapping
the
human
visual
area
hV4
have
resulted
in
the
existence
of
two
main
theories
as
to
its retinotpoic
organisation.
These
are
i)
the
full
hemifield
model,
which
states
the
entire
hemifield
of
hV4
is
located ventrally,
and
ii)
the
split
hemifield
model,
which
poses
hV4
is
mostly
a
ventral
area,
but
with
a
small
portion
located dorsally.
An
explanation
for
the
apparent
variation
between
subjects
was
suggested
with
the
discovery
of
the
venous eclipse
artefact
(Winawer
et
al.
2010),
caused
by
signal
distortion
in
the
region
of
the
Transverse
Sinus,
potentially obscuring
parts
of
hV4
in
some
subjects.
Puckett
et
al.,
2014,
suggested
that
voxel
responses
in
and
near
the
venous eclipse
are
reliably
inverted
rather
than
randomly
distorted.
Here
we
tested
whether
correcting
such
voxels
could restore
a
full,
ventral
hemifield
in
hV4
in
all
subjects.
The
procedure
was
partially
successful,
with
the
complete restoration
of
a
full
hemifield
in
one
subject,
and
improvements
in
the
hV4
maps
of
others.
In
summary
we
found complete
hemifield
representations
for
hV4
in
9
of
16
hemispheres.
Additionally,
consistent
clustering
of
inverted voxel
responses
was
seen
in
the
region
of
the
venous
eclipse
in
all
subjects. Ranking
Judgments
in
Visual
Working
Memory Rob
Taylor,
Mike
Le
Pelley,
&
Chris
Donkin Univeristy
of
New
South
Wales taylor.rt17@gmail.com A
major
debate
in
modeling
Visual
Working
Memory
(VWM)
is
whether
item
storage
is
best
described
by
a
discrete (e.g.,
slots)
or
continuous
(e.g.,
resources)
process.
Historically,
the
slots
account
has
received
most
support.
Usually, the
merit
upon
which
the
relative
fit
of
each
model
are
gauged
depend
upon
parametric
approaches.
However,
there are
issues
in
simply
comparing
deviance
indices
(e.g.,
AIC,
BIC)
which
may
lead
to
erroneous
conclusions
regarding
the likely
data
generating
model.
Instead,
we
use
ranking
judgements
which
require
minimal
parametric
assumptions
and permit
model
based
predictions
to
be
compared
without
the
need
for
model
fitting.
We
present
data
from
a
series
of experiments
that
manipulate
load
on
VWM. Both-‐edges
letter
position
in
word
recognition
errors Schubert,
Teresa
and
McCloskey,
Michael Study
done:
Johns
Hopkins
University.
First
author
currently:
ARC
Centre
of
Excellence
in
Cognition
and
its
Disorders, Macquarie
University teresa.schubert@mq.edu.au Much
recent
research
has
investigated
letter
position
coding
with
behavioural
tasks
such
as
lexical
decision
and same/different
judgments.
In
this
study
we
developed
a
new
paradigm
to
elicit
letter
identification
errors
from unimpaired
readers
in
a
word
recognition
task.
Of
particular
interest
are
letter
perseveration
errors,
which
reflect
the residual
activation
of
letters
from
previous
trials.
When
letters
perseverate
into
the
same
position
they
occupied
in
a previous
response,
the
errors
reveal
the
position
code
used
by
the
identification
system:
The
position
code
that successfully
accounts
for
the
position
of
the
perseverations
is
assumed
to
be
employed
in
word
recognition.
We compared
the
ability
of
position
schemes
based
on
the
word-‐beginning,
word-‐end,
both-‐edges,
midpoint,
as
well
as closed-‐
and
open-‐bigrams
to
account
for
the
position
of
over
15,000
perseveration
errors
in
our
corpus.
Results indicate
that
their
position
is
best
described
by
a
graded-‐both-‐edges
position
scheme.
In
such
a
scheme
letter
position is
represented
by
distance
from
both
the
beginning
and
end
of
the
word,
with
similar
representations
for
adjacent positions.
This
study
builds
upon
recent
work
that
posited
the
both-‐edges
scheme
in
reading
based
on
the
illusory word
paradigm
with
normal
readers
and
analysis
of
error
data
from
acquired
dyslexia.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI