EARLY RESULTS OF A HIP RESURFACING TRIAL

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty has become a popular treatment option for younger active patients. The early published results from designing surgeons/centers have been favourable. We undertook a prospective multi-center trial to determine the outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty at independent centers. The clinical, radiographic and functional results were assessed. A prospective IRB approved study was initiated in July 2003 to assess the outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty using a contemporary design implant. (Conserve Plus - Wright Medical Technology) Disease specific (Harris Hip Score/WOMAC) and global (Rand self assessment index) outcome measures were used. Radiographs were reviewed for component position and migration as well as any signs of lysis or loosening. Complications and re-operations were recorded. A total of one hundred and eighty-eight patients have been enrolled in the study to date. One hundred and four patients have a minimum one year follow-up and forty-six patients have a minimum two year follow-up. Mean Harris Hip Scores (pre-op, one year, two years) were fifty-five, eighty-nine and ninety-one. Mean WOMAC pain scores were forty-seven, ninety and ninety. Mean WOMAC stiffness scores were forty, seventy-eight and eighty-two. Mean WOMAC function scores were forty-six, eighty-seven and eighty. RAND physical function mean scores were thirty-three, seventy-six and seventy-six and the RAND physical limitations mean scores were nineteen, sixty-seven and seventy-five. Radiographic analysis showed average cup abduction to be forty-six degrees (range twenty-six to sixty-three). Average femoral stem position was one hundred and thiry-eight degrees (range one hundred and eighteen to one hundred and fifty-seven). Nine patients have been revised to date (4.8%). Four for acetabular loosening, two for neck fracture, one for femoral loosening, one for impingement and one for persistent pain. There have been eight other patients requiring re-operation without revision. Medical complications occurred in fifteen patients. Early results have demonstrated a good return of function in patients with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A high early revision rate (4.8%) was seen in our study. Technical factors appear to be the main contributor to the high early complication rate. Hip resurfacing is associated with a steep learning curve. We continue to utilise hip resurfacing in select patients but recommend caution for those who are new to the technique.