Correction to ‘Smoking status and attractiveness among exemplar and prototypical identical twins discordant for smoking’

R. Soc. open sci. 4 , 161076. (Published 13 December 2017). ([doi:10.1098/rsos.161076][1]) The penultimate sentence in the abstract is incorrect. It currently reads as follows: ‘Prototypical faces of smokers are judged more attractive and correctly identified as smokers more often … [1]: http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.161076