Evaluation of the size of time windows for the travelling salesman problem in delivery operations

2020 
A great challenge in operational research is to apply time-efficient algorithms to find the optimal solutions to the travelling salesman problem (TSP) and its many variations. The TSP with time windows (TSPTW) arises due to intense pressure for business to improve customer service. As online shopping becomes more popular, customer satisfaction increases if customers can decide when their orders are delivered to them. Customers may choose a time window, which is defined by an earliest delivery time and a latest delivery time, during which the package is delivered. Delivering packages to multiple customers is a typical TSPTW. One main challenge for a delivery business is to determine the size of the time window (i.e., the difference between the latest and earliest delivery times), which affects delivery cost and customer satisfaction. Although many previous studies investigated the TSPTW, none of those focused on the size of time windows. This study is the first that experiments with different time window sizes and determines their impact on tour duration, customer satisfaction, and solution time of the optimal delivery routes. The experiment results show that increasing the size of the time window decreases tour duration and customer satisfaction and increases solution time. Decreasing the size of the time window increases tour duration and customer satisfaction and decreases solution time. A small solution time is necessary for the scheduling of deliveries to many customers. A large solution time prevents a delivery business from delivering packages using optimal routes, which increases delivery cost and decreases customer satisfaction. The results of this study indicate that a general guideline for business is to allow customers to choose a time window size that is within the cost limit but is sufficiently small to maximize customer satisfaction and optimize delivery routes.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    29
    References
    4
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []