Paid exchanges are worth the price

Abstract We consider the list update problem as defined in the seminal work on competitive analysis by Sleator and Tarjan [13] . An instance of the problem consists of a sequence of requests to access items in a linked list. After an item is accessed, that item can be moved to any position forward in the list at no cost (a move called free exchange), and, at any time, any two adjacent items can be swapped at a cost of 1 (a move called paid exchange). The cost to access an item is equal to its current position in the list. The goal is to dynamically rearrange the list so as to minimize the total cost (accrued from accesses and exchanges) over the request sequence. We show a lower bound of 12/11 on the worst-case ratio between the performance of an (offline) optimal algorithm that can only perform free exchanges and that of an (offline) optimal algorithm that can perform both paid and free exchanges. This answers the question of the asymptotic relative power of the two models which has been open since Reingold and Westbrook [11] showed in 1996 that Sleator and Tarjan erred in [13] when they claimed that the two models are equivalent.