Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Sirolimus-Eluting Iron Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold in Porcine Coronary Artery at 6 Months

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the operability, 6-month efficacy, and safety of the novel sirolimus-eluting iron bioresorbable coronary scaffold (IBS) system compared with a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (XIENCE Prime stent) in porcine coronary arteries. Background Bioresorbable scaffolds have been considered the fourth revolution in percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the first-generation bioresorbable scaffold showed suboptimal results. Methods Forty-eight IBS and 48 EES were randomly implanted into nonatherosclerotic swine. The operability, efficacy, and safety of the IBS and EES were evaluated using coronary angiography, optical coherence tomography, micro–computed tomography, scanning electron microscopy, and histopathologic evaluation at 7, 14, 28, 90, and 180 days after implantation. Results The operability of the ultrathin IBS (∼70 μm) was comparable with that of the EES, except for its visibility. There was no statistically significant difference in area stenosis between the IBS and EES from 28 to 180 days. The IBS maintained its integrity up to 90 days without corrosion, while corrosion was observed in a few struts in 2 of 10 IBS at 180 days. The percentage of endothelialization of IBS was higher than that of XIENCE Prime stents within 14 days after implantation. The fibrin score was higher in the IBS group at 28 days but comparable with the EES group at 90 and 180 days. No scaffold or stent thrombosis was seen in either group. No abnormal histopathologic changes in scaffolded or stented vessel segments and 5 main remote organs were observed in either group. Conclusions Preclinical results suggest that the novel IBS has comparable operability, mid-term efficacy, and safety with the EES, and its corrosion profile in porcine coronary arteries is reasonable, which could support initial clinical study of the IBS.