Comment on “On the Anomalon Interpretation of 40Ar + Cu Collisions at 0.9 and 1.8 AGeV”

A recent article interpreted the experiment by Dersch et al. on the formation of 24Na in 40Ar + Cu interactions in a very simple manner. The results from emulsion experiments performed with 3.6 AGeV 22Ne were adapted for the interpretation of the experiments with 1.8 AGeV 40Ar. The model used the same mean value for the energy of minimum ionizing protons and pions at all angles. It is argued that a more complex approach is needed for a satisfactory interpretation.