Comparison in Effect of Heatsynch with Heat Detection Aids and CIDR‐Heatsynch in Dairy Heifers

Contents The objective of the present study was to determine whether oestrous detection with the help of oestrous detection aids during the Heatsynch without timed AI protocol is equally effective with the progesterone-combined protocol in dairy heifers. A total of 148 heifers were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. A group of heifers treated with Heatsynch with heat detection aids (n = 72) received GnRH on day 0, prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) on day 7 and oestradiol benzoate (EB) on day 8, while in controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-Heatsynch group (n = 76), CIDR was included during a period from GnRH to PGF2α. Heifers were checked for oestrus twice daily, i.e. from 09:00 to 10:00 hours and from 15:00 to 16:00 hours starting on day 2 for Heatsynch group and on day 8 in CIDR-Heatsynch group, and continued up to day 12. KAMAR®heat mount detector (KAMAR® Inc., Steamboat Springs, CO, USA) and ALL-WEATHER® PAINTSTIK® (LA-CO Industries Inc., Elk Grove Village, IL, USA) were used as heat detection aids. AI was conducted within 1 h after confirming oestrus in 72 heifers, while 19 animals were transferred with embryo 7 days after oestrus according to the request of the owners. Premature oestrus before PGF2α injection occurred in 18% of Heatsynch group. Of 13 heifers which showed premature oestrus, six were inseminated and two of them conceived. Oestrus detection rate within 12 days after initiation of the protocols did not differ between the two groups (94% vs 95%). There was no difference in the conception rate after first AI (including heifers that were inseminated before PGF2α injection) and embryo transfer between Heatsynch with heat detection aids and CIDR-Heatsynch groups (36% vs 44% and 70% vs 56%). It is concluded that the use of heat detection aids to monitor the occurrence of premature oestrus prior to PGF2α injection in Heatsynch protocol in dairy heifers was equally effective to the inclusion of CIDR.