테러 발생 시 국가 수사권 운용 검토 -미국을 중심으로-

Although information and criminal investigation activities should be put in place in counter-terrorism activities, South Korea has relatively few legal, institutional, and enforcement issues related to the operation of national investigation rights when terrorism occurs. Empirically, in the case of South Korea, there are no direct terrorist attacks, and there are quite a few views of North Korea's provocation to the South as a military provocation rather than a terrorist attack. Recently, it is necessary to clarify the viewpoint of looking at North Korea even if we look at actions such as the sudden interruption of communications by North Korea and the redevelopment of large ballistic missiles. It is time to discuss institutional and enforcement guidelines. This research looks at US terrorism-related institutional patriotism conspiracy law, RICO law, and AEDPA law to get to know the investigation procedures, methods and cases of the relevant departments, and to look at North Korea. It has to be clarified. For example, when looking at the current North Korean provocation, not by military provocation, but by terrorism, he looked at the applicable laws, and provided suggestions as to what cases could be applied as references. Therefore, in this paper, through the case of the United States, we searched for new suggestions that could be applied to the domestic case.