Fetal Weight Estimation Using Automated Fractional Limb Volume With 2‐Dimensional Size Parameters

2020 
OBJECTIVES: To develop new fetal weight prediction models using automated fractional limb volume (FLV). METHODS: A prospective multicenter study measured fetal biometry within 4 to 7 days of delivery. Three-dimensional data acquisition included the automated FLV that was based on 50% of the humerus diaphysis (fractional arm volume [AVol]) or 50% of the femur diaphysis (fractional thigh volume [TVol]) length. A regression analysis provided population sample-specific coefficients to develop 4 weight estimation models. Estimated and actual birth weights (BWs) were compared for the mean percent difference +/- standard deviation of the percent differences. Systematic errors were analyzed by the Student t test, and random errors were compared by the Pitman test. RESULTS: A total of 328 pregnancies were scanned before delivery (BW range, 825-5470 g). Only 71.3% to 72.6% of weight estimations were within 10% of actual BW using original published models by Hadlock et al (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:333-337) and INTERGROWTH-21st (Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49:478-486). All predictions were accurate by using sample-specific model coefficients to minimize bias in making these comparisons (Hadlock, 0.4% +/- 8.7%; INTERGROWTH-21st, 0.5% +/- 10.0%; AVol, 0.3% +/- 7.4%; and TVol, 0.3% +/- 8.0%). Both AVol- and TVol-based models improved the percentage of correctly classified BW +/-10% in 83.2% and 83.9% of cases, respectively, compared to the INTERGROWTH-21st model (73.8%; P .05). For these larger fetuses, both AVol and TVol models correctly classified BW (+/-10%) in 83.3% and 87.5% of cases compared to the others (Hadlock, 79.2%; INTERGROWTH-21st, 70.8%) although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, the inclusion of automated FLV measurements with conventional 2-dimensional biometry was generally associated with improved weight predictions.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    25
    References
    7
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []