Space, Time, Reality, Causality: Does it all Need Re-thinking?

In what way is the physics of elementary particles concerned with psychoanalysis, and in particular, psychoanalytic epistemology, given that the group enters its field of clinical experience and research? What is the justification for the focus of this reflection from the specific standpoint of the epistemic unity of psychoanalysis (that of the unconscious)? How are the correlations or conjunctions of subjectivities and, consequently, countertransference as “the most precious tool” and even “the instrument of knowledge par excellence” in analytic practice, to be conceptualized? What is it that guarantees the legitimacy and conditions of its handling? To say or claim that something passes from the unconscious of one person to another obliges us to ask ourselves the question: what is this thing, and how do this passage or these exchanges occur? How are we to account for the group psychic apparatus of subjectivities, of intragroup, intergenerational, or even transgenerational psychic transmissions? What hypotheses can we draw concerning the nature of the psyche so that the latter, which we inevitably observe (in clinical practice), is theoretically conceivable? Quantum physics, which establishes the existence of a non-physical dimension in matter and calls into question our conception of reality, space, time, and causality, has in effect destroyed the most solid foundations of traditional physics, of science in general, and even of human understanding. It introduces us to a world that does not obey the laws of classical physics.