Therapeutic effect compared between three cannulated screws and proximal femoral locking plate in treatment of femoral neck fracture

Objective To compare the therapeutic effect between three cannulated screws and proximal femoral locking plate in treatment of femoral neck fracture.Methods A total of 75 patients were included,the three cannulated screws group contained 31 patients,and the proximal femoral locking plate group contained 44 patients.The clinical healing time,hip function score at last follow-up and postoperative complication were compared.Results All patients were followed up for 13-18 (15.3 ± 3.2) months.The excellent and good rate of proximal femoral locking plate group was 95.5％ (42/44),and three cannulated screws group was 83.9％(26/31),there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).The clinical healing time of fracture and hip function score at last follow-up in proximal femoral locking plate group were significantly better than those in three cannulated screws group [(14.6 ± 1.7) weeks vs.(18.1 ± 4.9) weeks,(90.9 ± 3.5) scores vs.(82.3 ± 8.3) scores],there were statistical differences between the two groups (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions Proximal femoral locking plate provides short clinical healing time of fracture,stable fixation,good biomechanical properties and a low rate of postoperative complication in treatment of femoral neck fracture.It is one of the ideal methods in treatment of femoral neck fracture. Key words: Femoral neck fractures;  Locking plate;  Cannulated screw;  Internal fixation