Chest X-ray Interpretation by Radiographers Is Not Inferior to Radiologists: A Multireader, Multicase Comparison Using JAFROC (Jack-knife Alternative Free-response Receiver Operating Characteristics) Analysis
2018
Rationale and Objectives Chest X-rays (CXR) are one of the most frequently requested imaging examinations and are fundamental to many patient pathways. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of CXR interpretation by reporting radiographers (technologists). Methods A cohort of consultant radiologists ( n = 10) and reporting radiographers (technologists; n = 11) interpreted a bank ( n = 106) of adult CXRs that contained a range of pathologies. Jack-knife alternate free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) methodology was used to determine the performance of the observers (JAFROC v4.2). A noninferiority approach was used, with a predefined margin of clinical insignificance of 10% of average consultant radiologist diagnostic accuracy. Results The diagnostic accuracy of the reporting radiographers (figure of merit = 0.828, 95% confidence interval 0.808–0.847) was noninferior to the consultant radiologists (figure of merit = 0.788, 95% confidence interval 0.766–0.811), P Conclusions With appropriate postgraduate education, reporting radiographers are able to interpret CXRs at a level comparable to consultant radiologists.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
43
References
24
Citations
NaN
KQI