Monthly Difference in the Boreal Winter El Niño Precipitation Response over North America: Insights into Why January Is More Difficult to Predict than February

This study explores the monthly difference in the prediction skill of the ENSO response in boreal winter over North America reported in earlier studies. This monthly difference in the prediction skill is also revealed in atmosphere-ocean coupled and uncoupled NASA GEOS-5 model. Observational features of the ENSO response each month are analyzed using Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA-2) data.The results show that the prediction skill of the temperature and precipitation anomalies associated with the ENSO response over the western North America tends to be greater in February whereas lower in January. Coupled and uncoupled models both put negative geopotential height anomaly over the northeast Pacific to the west of observation in January, causing that the precipitation anomalies to be off the coast instead of the coast. This discrepancy between observation and model is minimal in February. West coast precipitation anomalies are shown to be sensitive to the location of this anomalous height anomaly, but the precipitation response all the southern tier of states appear less sensitive to errors in the zonal wind response.