Faith Healing in India: The Cultural Quotient of the Critical
2017
We have had two ‘cultures of critique'. One is where critique of a culture's own
principles is generated internally. The other is when critique is mounted from the
outside. This paper is an attempt to shore up the two-fold nature of both culture of
critique and critique of culture through a close examination of an extant and
entrenched cultural practice provisionally called ‘faith healing' in its interlocution
with western mental health models that are incumbent upon the Indian setting. This
paper will explore what critical theory may need to consider in the context of India.
Would it need a cultural turn, a culturalising? What is meant by culturalising? Would
‘culturalising', in turn, be premised on a bidirectional or dual critique, that is, a
critique of both the West's hegemonic principles as well as principles that hegemonize
the East, emanating from either the West or from the East? What relation would
critique set up with an existing culture and cultural practice? What relation would
culture set up with an existing culture of critique? In the process, this paper is also an
attempt to inaugurate and locate the beginning coordinates of a critique of critique
through the turn to culture in conditions called ‘faith healing'. The paper is also about
the tense and troubled dialogue between the current globalization of certain
frameworks in mental health, and local (faith-based) practices of health and healing
that have survived in India; survived even in mutation and transformation, through
colonialism, civilizing mission, welfarism and developmentalism. How would the
knowledge and practice of mental health take shape in India – a landscape
crisscrossed by on the one hand, aggressively modern institutions of mental health
science and on the other, extant and surviving institutions of faith-based healing
practices? While we remain critically mired in faith-based practices, while we cannot
but be critical of some faith-based practices, we also cannot announce the silent
demise of all Other imaginations of health and healing and let One global discourse
take hold of all cultures. Hence, perhaps the need for what we have called the difficult
‘dual critique’. For critique also means an account of and an attention to experience
and practice; an account formulated on its own terms and not on terms put in place by
globalizing discourses.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
2
Citations
NaN
KQI