Assessment of structured classroom debate to teach an antimicrobial stewardship elective course

Abstract Background and purpose The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a structured classroom debate format on teaching antimicrobial stewardship. Educational activity and setting An active learning approach using a debate format was implemented to engage students in infectious diseases concepts to further develop critical thinking skills. This was a one-group, pre- and posttest design conducted in third year pharmacy students enrolled at the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine School of Pharmacy Georgia campus. A ten-item assessment survey was used prior to and after the course to evaluate student knowledge. Student perception of skill development was assessed by a survey using a five-point Likert scale. The skills assessed included critical thinking, communication, public speaking, research/drug information, and teamwork. Findings Thirty-three students participated in the six debates over the course of the semester. There was a statistically significant increase in post-knowledge assessment mean score (75%) compared to pre-knowledge assessment mean score (45%). The post-course survey showed improved confidence in perception of skills in all of the areas assessed. Summary The structured classroom debate format has a positive association with increasing students' knowledge level and perception of skills assessed.