Clinical predictors of Dimethyl Fumarate response in multiple sclerosis: a real life multicentre study

Abstract Background Dimethyl-fumarate (DMF) was effective and safe in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in randomized clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DMF and factors related to drug response in real-life setting. Methods We analysed prospectively collected demographic and clinical data for patients treated with DMF in six multiple sclerosis (MS) centers from 2015 to 2017 in Campania region, Italy. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to assess relationships between baseline parameters and DMF efficacy outcomes, Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression and No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3) status. Results we analyzed data of 456 patients (67% female subjects, mean age 40 ± 12 years, mean disease duration 9 ± 9 years, mean treatment duration 18 ± 11 months, median EDSS 2.5, 0–8). Proportion of Naive versus pretreated with other DMTs patients was 149/307 (32.7%), with 122 patients switching to DMF for disease activity (26.7%) and 185 for safety and tolerability issues (40.6%). During treatment with DMF, the annualized relapse rate was reduced by 75% respect to the pre-treatment ARR [incidence-rate-ratio (IRR) = 0.25, p  Conclusions We confirm that DMF shows a good efficacy in both naive patients and patients switching from other first-line DMTs, especially in patients with early onset of disease. Higher baseline EDSS was a risk factor for discontinuing DMF therapy, while shorter disease duration was protective for both EDSS progression and NEDA-3 status maintenance.