Evaluation of consumer monitors to measure particulate matter

Abstract Recently, inexpensive ( 2.5 measured with the CAMs and a medium-cost aerosol photometer (personal DataRAM 1500, Thermo Scientific) were compared to that from reference instruments for three aerosols (salt, welding fume, and Arizona road dust, ARD) at concentrations up to 8500 µg/m 3 . Three of each type of CAM were included to estimate precision. Compared to reference instruments, mass concentrations measured with the Foobot (r-value = 0.99) and medium-cost photometer (r-value=0.99) show strong correlation, whereas those from the Speck (r-value range 0.91-0.99) and AirBeam (0.7–0.96) were less correlated. The Foobot bias was (−12%) for ARD and measurements were similar to the medium-cost instrument. Foobot bias was ( 2.5 in the workplace after site-specific calibration to account for particle size and composition.