Differential associations of APOE-epsilon 2 and APOE-epsilon 4 alleles with PET-measured amyloid-beta and tau deposition in older individuals without dementia

Purpose: To examine associations between the APOE-e2 and APOE-e4 alleles and core Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathological hallmarks as measured by amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau PET in older individuals without dementia. Methods: We analyzed data from 462 ADNI participants without dementia who underwent Aβ ([18F]florbetapir or [18F]florbetaben) and tau ([18F]flortaucipir) PET, structural MRI, and cognitive testing. Employing APOE-e3 homozygotes as the reference group, associations between APOE-e2 and APOE-e4 carriership with global Aβ PET and regional tau PET measures (entorhinal cortex (ERC), inferior temporal cortex, and Braak-V/VI neocortical composite regions) were investigated using linear regression models. In a subset of 156 participants, we also investigated associations between APOE genotype and regional tau accumulation over time using linear mixed models. Finally, we assessed whether Aβ mediated the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between APOE genotype and tau. Results: Compared to APOE-e3 homozygotes, APOE-e2 carriers had lower global Aβ burden (βstd [95% confidence interval (CI)]: − 0.31 [− 0.45, − 0.16], p = 0.034) but did not differ on regional tau burden or tau accumulation over time. APOE-e4 participants showed higher Aβ (βstd [95%CI]: 0.64 [0.42, 0.82], p < 0.001) and tau burden (βstd range: 0.27-0.51, all p < 0.006). In mediation analyses, APOE-e4 only retained an Aβ-independent effect on tau in the ERC. APOE-e4 showed a trend towards increased tau accumulation over time in Braak-V/VI compared to APOE-e3 homozygotes (βstd [95%CI]: 0.10 [− 0.02, 0.18], p = 0.11), and this association was fully mediated by baseline Aβ. Conclusion: Our data suggest that the established protective effect of the APOE-e2 allele against developing clinical AD is primarily linked to resistance against Aβ deposition rather than tau pathology.