Clinical management of the status of atypical endometrial cells using the descriptive reporting format for endometrial cytology

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and reinforce a clinical management regimen for atypical endometrial cell (ATEC) categories within the descriptive reporting format for endometrial cytology. METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2014, 215 samples, for which histological examination was performed immediately or within 3 months after cytology, were cytologically diagnosed as ATEC. For these samples, the medical records were retrospectively reviewed to identify risk factors for malignancy. RESULTS: Among 152 samples diagnosed as ATEC, of undetermined significance, 19 (12.5%) were malignant. In the younger group (age <55 years), the χ2 values of body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (5.85), gravidity (5.64) and parity (5.15) were relatively high, suggesting that these were risk factors for malignancy. Of the nulligravida patients, those with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 , 28% were diagnosed with malignant disease. In the older group (≥55 years), endometrial thickening (6.84), atypical genital bleeding (6.43) and BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (3.79) were found to be risk factors for malignancy. Of the patients with endometrial thickening and atypical genital bleeding, 67% were diagnosed with malignant disease. Among 63 samples diagnosed as ATEC, cannot exclude atypical endometrial hyperplasia or more, 35 (55.6%) samples were positive for malignancy. CONCLUSIONS: High-risk patients diagnosed with ATEC, of undetermined significance were identified. Endometrial biopsy should be considered for nulligravida patients aged <55 years with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 .