A randomized controlled trial of lacosamide versus sodium valproate in status epilepticus.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (LCM) and sodium valproate (SVA) in lorazepam (LOR)-resistant status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: Patients with LOR-resistant SE were randomized to intravenous LCM 400 mg at a rate of 60 mg/kg/min or SVA 30 mg/kg at a rate of 100 mg/min. The SE severity score (STESS), duration of SE and its etiology, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were noted. Primary outcome was seizure cessation for 1 h, and secondary outcomes were 24 h seizure remission, in hospital death and severe adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included, and their median age was 40 (range 18-90) years. Thirty-three patients each received LCM and SVA. Their demographic, clinical, STESS, etiology, and MRI findings were not significantly different. One hour seizure remission was not significantly different between LCM and SVA groups (66.7% vs. 69.7%; p = 0.79). Twenty-four hour seizure freedom was higher in SVA (20, 66.6%) compared with LCM group (15, 45.5%), but this difference was not statistically significant. Death (10 vs. 12) and composite side effects (4 vs. 6) were also not significantly different in LCM and SVA groups. LCM was associated with hypotension and bradycardia (one patient), and SVA with liver dysfunction (six patients). SIGNIFICANCE: In LOR-resistant SE patients, both LCM and SVA have comparable efficacy and safety. SVA resulted in slightly better 24 h seizure remission.