Contemporary Relevancy of Carotid–Subclavian Bypass Defined by an Experience Spanning Five Decades

Background The contemporary impact of and indications for carotid–subclavian bypass (CSB) are essential considerations in decision making for brachiocephalic reconstruction. Methods We analyzed operative outcomes, long-term graft patency, and the extended epidemiological impact of the primary disease process in 287 consecutive patients (mean age, 60.6 years; 43.2% male) who received CSB for symptomatic brachiocephalic disease. Results Technical success was achieved in each patient. Operative mortality was 1.0% (3/287) and total (ipsilateral [1.4%, 4/287] plus contralateral [0.7%, 2/287]) stroke rate was 2.1% (6/287). Primary patency rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 94.2 ± 1.9%, 88.6 ± 3.2%, and 86.5 ± 3.8%, respectively. Kaplan–Meier freedom from specific events at 15 years was as follows: restenosis, 86.5 ± 3.8%; death, 67.5 ± 5.2%; coronary revascularization, 59.6 ± 6.3%; myocardial infarction, 82.8 ± 3.9%; stroke, 85.6 ± 4.9%; other vascular procedure, 60.0 ± 5.5%; adverse cardiac outcome (death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization), 44.5 ± 5.5%; and adverse vascular outcome (restenosis, stroke, or other vascular procedure), 48.7 ± 5.3%. Conclusions CSB produces excellent long-term patency and extended symptom relief, with acceptably low operative morbidity and mortality. Despite the durability and success of CSB, the primary disease process has an adverse impact on long-term prognosis and significantly influences decision making with regard to management. The proven durability may offer extended symptom relief to the relatively younger patient, a survival advantage associated with preservation of internal mammary artery perfusion in patients at risk for myocardial revascularization, optimal durability in patients requiring a concomitant open procedure, and preservation of limb function in patients who require aortic endovascular graft placement.