An investigation of the perceived consequences to employees of reducing employment related trip end choices in Cape Town

In South Africa, the bench mark for transport expenditure is 10% of monthly income. In the global South “transport poverty” is not a foreign concept considering that most individuals use more than 10% of their income on transport. The driver of these high transport costs is the positioning of economic activities relative to residential areas. Additionally, concerns over Peak Oil and its impact on fuel price means transport will become even more unaffordable in the future. Using Cape Town as a study area, this paper explores the concept of “too much” choice in a job choice framework to investigate the hypothesis that, the provision of a large catchment area from which individuals seek jobs does not continue to yield an increase in utility, but that there is a point beyond which benefits from having more choice are negligible. The results suggest that in a job choice framework, an increase in catchment size does not result in an increase in utility, instead as the catchment size increases utility decreases. It is therefore concluded that there is an amount of accessibility that cities can provide that can be considered to be “sufficient” and still enable individuals to attain positive utility. From the findings in this study, providing “sufficient” accessibility can be achieved by locating future urban growth thereby reducing home to work distances which may translate to a reduction in transport costs.