Long-Term Efficacy of Initial Microvascular Decompression Versus Subsequent Microvascular Decompression for Idiopathic Hemifacial Spasm

Objective Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a disorder characterized by intermittent, involuntary facial muscle contractions. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the gold treatment for HFS. The aim of this research was to discuss whether patients undergoing MVD as their initial surgical intervention experience greater spasm control than patients experiencing an MVD performed as a subsequent surgical intervention. Methods The study included 976 patients with HFS, 452 of whom (group A) underwent MVD as their initial surgical intervention and 524 of whom (group B) underwent subsequent MVD. Relevant clinical data including outcome of MVD, operative findings, complications, and so on were collected immediately after MVD operation and at follow-up. Results The follow-up period was 7–9 years (mean, 7.96 ± 0.87 years). The mean age at intervention was 53.14 years and 55.43 years in the 2 groups, respectively. The long-term postoperative relief rate of patients in the 2 groups was 98.23% and 87.21%, respectively. There was a significant difference in long-term postoperative relief rate of patients between the 2 groups ( P Conclusions Patients undergoing MVD for HFS as the primary treatment experience better long-term efficacy than patients first treated with botulinum neurotoxin type A.